Saturday, 21 February 2015

Sustainable Water Management - An Approach

Bangalore, with a population of 9 million, requires approximately 1350 MLD[1] (150 ltr per day per person) of water every day. BWSSB draws about 1380 MLD of water from Cavery (the maximum allotted to Karnataka by Cavery tribunal) and pumps over a distance of 95 KM and to a height of 450 mtr at a cost of Rs 100 crores / annum. But due to leakage and loss due to pilferage (450 MLD) and non-domestic use (150), it only supplies 780MLD of water to Bangalore. The city is dependent on bore wells, pumps and water tankers to meet the shortfall of about 570! The city has been exploiting underground water three times more than the rate of charging of ground water. As a result, the level of underground water has been continuously going down and reached a depth of 800 ft at most places compared to 150-200 ft fifteen years back. It is obvious that the city is heading for a severe water crisis as indicated by several reports (Task force formed by Govt of Karnataka[2] and Azim Premji[3]) and may lead to evacuation of a large population of the city due to water shortage. See section " Deteriorating condition of lakes in Bangalore" for a brief overview on the condition of lakes in Bangalore.

With severe problem of water security for the city,  rejuvenation of lakes must be combined with rain water harvesting by big houses, offices, layouts and complexes. Combining the two, the action plan for addressing water problem of the city can be put into short term and long term. The short term activities that can be taken immediately by the Govt are

1.      Stop further encroachment of lakes / raja-kaluves and all lakes should be fully fenced.

2.      Provide for one govt agency who is fully responsible and accountable for all aspect of lake rejuvenation. All lakes should come under it and not divided among different govt agencies (as it is today)  It should have high powered coordination committee with other depts. (namely BBMP, BDA, BWSSB, revenue dept) for effective implementation of works in different areas.

3.      Prepare a lake rejuvenation plan in consultation with lake groups  and lake activists, and their current status should be made public and shared on internet. It should have a mechanism for people to report issues as observed by them, and that should be tracked by the one agency responsible for it.

4.      Provide for sewage treatment plan for really large lakes and not for all lakes. Otherwise, a good part of lake bed area will go for installing and operating STP only.

5.      Stop sewage inflow into lakes completely. Every big apartment complex / layout and big offices must have Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) for treating their internal sewage. The treated water from STPs can be used as a source of water to nearby lakes. This can be done by creating interest groups of local people who can take responsibility to ensure that water being discharged into lakes meets stipulated purification criteria.

6.      Bring a strong law and set up a mechanism for Rain Water Harvesting (RWH) in all big houses, offices, layouts and complexes. Effective and empowered ward committees or local bodies should be fully involved in creating awareness and feedback on implementation of RWH. People with good working RWH should be given rebate in their water bills. On  the other hand, non implementation of RWH should carry some penalty.

 The Govt should also have a long term plan, as listed below :-

1.      Separate sewage from Storm Water Network (SWN) and raja kaluves. Once the raja kaluves and SWN are mostly free of sewage, it can be used as a very powerful means of city wide rain water harvesting and providing a source of quality water to lakes. It will also require that sanctioning of new houses and layouts will mandatorily require approved sewage connection. The pollution control board should be effectively armed with appropriate amendments in laws for controlling discharge of sewage into open SWN  and should have adequate man power for effective enforcement.

2.      Digging of bore wells should require prior approval and license to operate. Bore well operators should be brought under a regulatory body for proper control of their pumping licenses, quality checks and avoiding over exploitation of ground water. They can be used for supplying water in deficit areas and meeting seasonal shortfalls. If properly controlled by the regulatory body by BWSSB, they can provide a support mechanism to BWSSB for meeting water requirement of the city.

3.      The Govt should consider providing two water pipes for every house - one for drinking and cooking, and another for all other usage. Water charges should also be highly differentiated so that 90-100 ltr water  / day can be provided at a very low fixed cost. But if any one crosses this limit then he should pay the entire bill at the full rate (for the entire amount consumed ant not only the delta)

Deteriorating condition of lakes in Bangalore


Bangalore was known for its garden, its pleasant climate and its thousand lakes that provided all the water requirement of the city till early seventies. Alas, it is no more like this today and the city is going through severe water crisis with vast stretches of city left at the mercy of water tankers! It is not that it happened suddenly but it has been in the making over a period of time. Unfortunately, Govt agencies have turned a blind eye to this development. In a blind rush to manage the increasing demand for housing, the city planners allowed a free run to land mafia by letting them encroach on raja-kaluves, lake beds and buffer zones for lakes. The destruction of interconnectivity between lakes and disappearance of lake buffer zones has resulted in the death of most of the city lakes. Today we are left with 189 lakes (in BBMP area, as per justice Patil report) out of which only 50-60 have enough water and rest are on the verge of disappearance! The neglect and disregard for such rapid encroachment assumes criminal dimension when we note that the founding fathers of the city were far sighted enough to fore-see the need of this wonderful system of thousands of interconnected tanks, as the city was not on the bank of any river.

 Reports by several committees and Karnataka high court have made the same observation and have submitted detailed report to Govt on restoration of lakes in Blr. Notable among them are - (a) Report of task force headed by V Balasubramanian (retd addnl chief Secy GoK); (b) Justice N K Patil led committee constituted by Karnataka HC in Feb 2010 proposed action plan for restoration of 189 lakes in Blr; (c) The Karnatka HC passed an order dt 11th Feb 2012 outlining clear guidelines for protection and restoration of lakes in Bangalore. In spite of all the information, data and clear action plan available to the GoK, there has been very little movement in this direction. It is clear that the problem is not due to lack of awareness, knowledge or technical, but a political one. It is basically lack of will of the Govt due to political pressure and vested interests. Hence it is obvious that the solution also has to be one that makes it politically viable for a govt to work on lake restoration. This can be done in two ways - (a) work with political parties to make it as part of their agenda or vision document for the upcoming BBMP election; (b) make enough people aware of the problem to create enough public pressure to demand restoration of lakes.

If Govt agencies are so blinded or careless for the city then local teams consisting of concerned citizen have come forward to protect lakes in their locality and raise objections and file complaint when they see violations. It is a long battle but has to be fought for our own sake as people are the ultimate stakeholder of the city. Realizing this, most lake activists, NGOs and social organizations have come under one platform called "One Bengaluru for Lakes" (OBL). It has been working to bring focus on key problems for lake rejuvenation, bring awareness and get people's support for the key demands, providing a common platform for learning, sharing of problems / solutions. The key demands, as agreed by all members of OBL, are available at https://www.facebook.com/SaveBengaluruLakes.

Role of OBL


One Bengaluru for Lakes must work on both the front of creating public awareness and making it an important campaign issue. On the one hand, we must make revival of lakes as a burning issue that should be in the agenda of all political parties. It must become an important campaign issue not only in the upcoming BBMP election but in other future election also. The leaders of all political parties must be made aware of the issues and asked to take a stand for lake revival. Most of the initiatives of lake activists in the past have failed because of the lack of will on the part of Govt agencies. Lake activists can only highlight the problem, raise complaint and try to work with Govt agencies. Because, ultimately, the work for lake rejuvenation has to be done by Govt agencies and it can happen only if they understand the problem and have the will to do it. On the other hand, we also must work on educating public and make them understand the benefit of lakes. People will support and participate in rejuvenation of lake in their area when they see lakes as a place for recreation, jogging, cultural activities etc, in addition to providing water security to the city. We must also engage these people in support of the key demands that most of lake activists have agreed to. Multiple groups of people, including school children, writing to Govt agencies will make them listen to what people want. OBL can play this role in giving voice to the concern of the people of Bangalore for the sorry state of lakes in the city.



[1] Data as per report of task force headed by Mr  V Balasubramanian
[2] BANGALORE dies when its lakes die paper by Mr V Balasubramanian dt Sep 2014
[3] WIPRO Chairman Azim Premji - http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-02-07/news/58902894_1_azim-premji-girl-child-water-problem